Essay Writing Samples

Research Paper on Organic Food

Organic food is the source of modern-day debates over the value of food grown with fewer chemicals and less additives. While the health benefits of organic food are high, major news networks have been accused of arguing there is a hype surrounding the benefits. This sample research written by an Ultius professional writer goes in-depth regarding the health benefits of organic food.

Healthy lifestyle choices and eating organic foods

Because organic food is healthier for you in general, contains fewer chemicals and promotes a better environment, it is a better lifestyle choice. In the last ten years, there has been much attention paid to organic foods and how they are redefining the way in which we consume agricultural goods. Various health groups and universities have undergone studies in order to show that organic food is a better option for consumers.

However, major news reporters and some experts have claimed that there was “hype” with organic food and it did not represent healthier lifestyle options for consumers. In looking further at organic food and how it differs from traditional fruits and vegetables (or other food items), it is clear that there are some benefits to it that are not present in normal foods.

Standford University’s organic food and consumer products research

Organic food is just better for you. Recent studies done by a major research university, Stanford, have shown that organic food is healthier for you on the grounds that genetically modified foods are bad for your health. While we consider most fruits and vegetables to be the same, going to the grocery store and picking out our food does not tell us where it came from or how it was raised.

Deirde Imus reported for Fox News that the Stanford organic food study she researched “revealed that organic fruits and vegetables contain on average 12 percent more health-promoting compounds than conventionally grown produce – compounds like secondary metabolites, which are believed to protect against obesity, cancer, and heart disease” (Imus).

There are chemicals in organic foods that are natural, great for our immune system and just not found in other foods that we eat today. Clearly, the fact that organic food is not heavily modified or tampered by people shows that there are advantages to natural ingredients.

Reinventing natural intentions using organic products

Also, it is important to remember that organic food is the intended way for humans to eat. While humans have evolved over the course of thousands of years, our bodies are still oriented towards eating unmodified food. Because most of the food that we eat today is genetically modified or treated in some way, it is unnatural by default. As the human body has not had time to evolve and account for the differences in the food, organic is the natural food that our body expects.

The organic food that we can buy is wholly not tampered with and represents the closest we can possibly get to foods that our ancestors actually ate. Given that there are immense health problems with processed foods such as McDonalds and others, obesity is quite common and people have yet to realize that these foods are just not natural for humans to eat. Ultimately, humans have just not evolved enough to process this tampered food better than we can process organic.

Genetically modified foods and chemicals

Organic food lacks unhealthy chemicals. Organic foods are made without using pesticides or other chemicals that are not natural, or healthy, for the human body. Recent studies at Stanford show organic foods simply lack all of the extraneous pesticides and chemicals that are normally used to raise agricultural products as well as meats. But, because some chemicals used in food is seriously dangerous, organic foods are a better choice as they lack these ingredients.

The Stanford study showed that normal foods contained various “types of pesticides most toxic to people…” that are very dangerous: “These are insecticides that target the nervous system, and they have been linked in studies of American kids with lower birth weight, ADHD and hyperactivity” (Castillo).

When farmers use chemicals to keep bugs off of their food, they are simultaneously infecting it dangerous chemicals that can cause lots of damage to people as well. Organic foods, however, do not use these unhealthy chemicals in the process of their production. Also, on the grounds that diseases spread because of toxic chemicals in foods, organic is better in that way too.

For instance, when mad cow disease started to really spread, it drew attention to the way in which livestock animals were being treated, physically and chemically. Come to find out, the food we eat is tampered and assembled at the lowest possible cost. With organic food, you will not find the use of unnatural and unhealthy chemicals to preserve it or keep bugs off of it.

No pesticides and fewer chemicals in organic food products

Because organic food is made without pesticides or other extraneous chemicals, it cannot develop tendencies to harm people. For example, according to Crystal Smith-Spangler and colleagues, livestock that was organic did lower the chance of people potentially eating food that was antibiotic resistant. They found that genetically modified chicken have a higher risk for contamination with bacteria resistant to 3 or more antibiotics than were organic alternatives. This increased prevalence of antibiotic resistance may be related to the routine use of antibiotics in conventional animal husbandry. (Smith-Spangler 358).

Such evidence shows that when consuming pork or chicken hat is not organic, there is a much higher risk for getting sick. As a result, organic food is a much safer option for those that do not want to take the risk of eating genetically modified food that offers more risks. Fewer chemicals being used results in a much more natural diet for people and consumption of foods that are safe instead of being risky.

Organic industry’s positive impact on the environment

Organic food is better for the whole environment in general. Besides the personal health benefits, organic food is also better for the environment because all of the chemicals used to produce regular goods are not integrated into the soil, water, and air. When pesticides and other chemicals are used to produce goods and cattle, they go into the groundwater and fill it with chemicals that require filtering to get rid of. Some of these chemicals even make it into the ocean and worsen the marine pollution problem already present across the globe.

According to the Organic Trade Association, “A global survey of groundwater pollution shows that a toxic brew of pesticides, nitrogen fertilizers, industrial chemicals, and heavy metals is fouling groundwater everywhere” (Organic Trade).

This shows that when we produce agricultural goods like vegetables and cattle, we are also polluting the environment, which is not good for people. This has already caused some issues to the current land we use as well:

“Nearly 40 percent of the world’s agricultural land is seriously degraded, undermining both present and future production capacity” (Organic Trade).

As a result, focusing on growing mostly organic foods will not only lead to healthier lives for the individual consuming the foods, but also other individuals (and children of the future) that may have suffered as a result. This is a much broader long-term benefit or organic foods.

Impact on air quality

In addition, eating organic foods also makes for a much better environment in terms of air quality. The main issue is that the current way that we produce foods creates carbon-dioxide, which goes into the air and is not beneficial for humans in high quantities. These dangerous emissions also have been linked to climate changes caused by global warming.

Luckily, “organic practices can remove about 7,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from the air each year and sequester it in an acre of farmland” (Organic Trade).

This means that organic foods actually help improve the air quality that we all consume over the long haul. Moreover, when farmers produce organic produce, it is much better for the soil. Soil that has been sprayed with pesticides and other invasive chemicals suffers from reduced richness of nutrients and quality. However, according to the USDA, soil that has only been used to grow organic food has been shown to be richer, healthier and more likely to last longer (Teasdale). So, while organic food does offer personal benefits to consumers, its effects also last longer in terms of how much value they offer to society in general.

However, according to the USDA, soil that has only been used to grow organic food has been shown to be richer, healthier and more likely to last longer (Teasdale). So, while organic food does offer personal benefits to consumers, its effects also last longer in terms of how much value they offer to society in general.

Misconceptions about organic food

Despite the evidence given, there have been some studies and research initiatives to show that there are no benefits to organic food, and these are simply not correct. Because many different studies by different scientists and organizations can have different political and economic agendas, there is much more opportunity for them to be wholly misread.

According to Deirde Imus, “the myth that organic foods are no better than their conventional counterparts is beyond salacious: it is simply untrue” (Imus).

Many studies have been done in order to show that there are scientific and nutritional grounds for the advantages of organic foods over regular ones. Even on the basis of just history, we know that tampered and genetically modified food is a new age phenomenon. Looking back hundreds of years, the United States’ obesity problem and other long-term negative health trends were minimal or unheard of until recently. The core difference over time was that the food became much more processed in terms of how chemicals were being used.

Are you a healthy student? Steer clear of these 20 cheap college foods.

Conclusion

As we have seen, less chemicals, stronger health benefits, and a stronger environment have shown that organic food is much healthier for you on the whole. Humans have not evolved enough to the point where they can eat processed foods without feeling adverse effects such as sickness, obesity and an excess of chemicals in the body. Organic foods, however, do not contain as many bad chemicals and actually have ones that promote longevity and well-being.

Especially in meats and livestock, organic is a better option because the animals cannot develop antibiotic agents like in traditional growth trends of cattle. Also, organic food is just better for the environment. Because organic fosters no use of pesticides, this excess waste cannot seep into water supplies or introduce more carbon dioxide into our air. These health benefits are not only good for individuals but society in general. A counter-argument for the misreading of scientific evidence was also discussed in order to show that there may be conflicting evidence that is just not grounded in truth or data.

Works Cited

Castillo, Michele. “Study on benefits of organic foods is misleading, consumer group argues – HealthPop – CBS News.” Breaking News Headlines: Business, Entertainment & World News – CBS News. N.p., 4 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Nov. 2012. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57505839-10391704/study-on-benefits-of-organic-foods-is-misleading-consumer-group-argues/.

Imus, Deirdre. “Study examines benefits of organic foods | Fox News.” Fox News – Breaking News Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos & News Videos. N.p., 10 Sept. 2012. Web. 26 Nov. 2012. http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/09/10/study-examines-benefits-organic-foods/

Organic Trade Association. “The Global Environment – Organic Trade Association.” Organic Trade Association. N.p., 2 Nov. 2008. Web. 29 Nov. 2012. http://www.ota.com/organic/benefits/global.html.

Smith-Spangler, Crystal. “Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives? A Systematic Review.” Annals of Internal Medicien 157.5 (2012): 348-368. Print.

Teasdale, John, and Gary Banowetz. “No Shortcuts in Checking Soil Health.” ARS : Home. Agricultural Research Magazine, n.d. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/AR/archive/jul07/soil0707.htm?pf=1.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *